![]() > Actually it's the opposite and that's the reason I started training Z7 > your body by the numbers, are actually easier for you to complete That is to say, that the Z7 session although more > You could be more physiologically gifted for a Z7 session than a > magnitude of my numbers are compatible with yours (or anyone doing > Thanks for getting back to me, I am very curious to see if the order > home i'll check out what I have and post a reply. > I can't comment on the first part yet, I've not looked before. > Ok, so Im finally getting around to checking this, how do I see Add to that the 10' MB and that I guess accounts for the difference. Since your sprints are shorter than mine that may explain the smaller difference since (I am guessing) even if you attain a higher PMax, you are putting less work in Z7 than I am at 15". I don't think HR plays any role in AnTISS does it? These numbers seem to be pretty off your numbers, I am not sure if I have something setup wrongly or if this is what's supposed to be. This session counts for much more than the z6 one, but I find this session much easier on my legs/heart/lungs. For this session GC computes 15 for AnTISS. You can see on the 10' MB my W' depleting and my HR peaking at 176bpm (Only on > 20' threshold intervals uphill I get my HR to the maximum of 190). The hightlighted interval shows HR of 151bpm (I started at around 130 and it's not enough time to go up) and my typical badly low average power for this kind of intervals at 763W. The z7 screenshot shows a 10x15" + 10' Microburst. These sessions are the most painful to me, and I find it strange that they don't count much for AnTISS. For this session the computed AnTISS is 2. The z6 screenshot shows a + You can see the typical highlighted interval at the same HR as in the Z5. In any case I don't mind if these sessions do not count for the long term Anaerobic TISS. I think a proper Z5 training is fine to get 0 since the work is mostly aerobic. For this session GC computes 0 for the AnTISS. ![]() The average HR on the highlighted typical interval is 166 which is in the middle of Z4 Threshold (my zone breaks at 112-136-155-173). My Z5 sessions are easier, but still: in the screenshot you can see a session of 6x3' + 4x2' at 117% target. Oh that's pretty different than my numbers! I am attaching three screenshots. Thanks again for taking your time to report your numbers! > Another session with 10圆 second max sprints in it is showing 4.4 > I did a session 20x1min 115% and GC is showing 2.1 Anaerobic TISS. > also did a hard fast ride in the morning.) > I did a session 10x1min 115% and GC is showing 3.x Anaerobic TISS. > Ok I looked back through some data (after finally importing everything.) Numbers are coherent with yours would suffice for me. fit as examples but only a confirmation that the That the Z6 exercises are not contributing at all compared with the Z7Įxercises, but If I go with RPE or even Coggan's PMC, they contribute My main concern is to try to evaluate if I am doing the right exercisesĪt the right target, and using An TISS as a guideline it seems to be Power is consistent at 5,31W/Kg, and then for 1' it's pretty bad atħ.95W/Kg and my PMax is pretty horrible at only 13.4W/Kg. Looking at tables like in Allen-Coggan's book > Your power curve could spike in Z7 and be relatively flat in Z6?Īctually it's the opposite and that's the reason I started training Z7Īs I am a horrible sprinter. > your body by the numbers, are actually easier for you to complete than the That is to say, that the Z7 session although more demanding on > You could be more physiologically gifted for a Z7 session than a Z6 The 2nd part of your question could be answered by this:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |